Recent News

Utah ‘Porn Tax’ Bill With VPN Provisions Passes State Senate

SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah state Senate has passed a bill that would impose a 2% tax on the revenues of adult websites doing business in that state, and make sites liable if Utah minors use VPNs to circumvent geolocation.

As XBIZ reported in January, the bill as originally introduced would have imposed a 7% tax on the gross receipts of adult websites doing business in that state. It would also have required adult sites to notify the state’s Division of Consumer Protection of their in-state activities and pay an annual fee of $500. The bill has since undergone revisions, however.

As currently amended, SB 73 is now a broader bill covering various activities of the Division of Consumer Protection and other government entities. It incorporates some provisions from the original version, and amends or removes others — including the notification and annual fee requirements.

Rather than 7%, the state Senate-approved version would now impose an excise tax of 2% on adult sites operating in Utah. The new tax would apply to transactions for “access to digital images, digital audio-visual works, digital audio works, digital books, or gaming services,” including streaming or subscription access to those works and services.

Industry attorneys have cited a number of potential legal hurdles such a tax might face. However, as XBIZ reported in July 2025, Alabama recently imposed a similar 10% tax. Meanwhile, Virginia legislators are also considering such a measure, and state senators in Pennsylvania have floated the idea of doing the same.

Revenue from the proposed new tax in Utah would be directed to a state account for funding “(a) mental health treatment programs for minors affected by material harmful to minors; (b) educational programs for parents, guardians, educators, and minors on the mental health risks associated with material harmful to minors; (c) early prevention and intervention programs for minors at risk of mental health harm from material harmful to minors; and (d) research and public awareness campaigns addressing mental health harm to minors caused by material harmful to minors.”

VPN Requirements Added 

As amended, Utah’s SB 73 also includes a provision stating: “An individual is considered to be accessing the website from this state if the individual is actually located in the state, regardless of whether the individual is using a virtual private network, proxy server, or other means to disguise or misrepresent the individual’s geographic location to make it appear that the individual is accessing a website from a location outside this state.”

The bill would additionally prohibit adult websites from facilitating or encouraging the use of a VPN, proxy server or other means to circumvent age verification requirements, “including by providing: (a) instructions on how to use a virtual private network or proxy server to access the website; or (b) means for individuals in this state to circumvent geofencing or blocking.”

A common criticism of state AV bills is that, since they apply only in a particular state, users can easily use virtual private networks (VPNs) to avoid being singled out for age verification. As XBIZ has reported, media attention around the widespread use of VPNs to circumvent age verification has inspired efforts to close that practical loophole.

For instance, West Virginia’s SB 498 would mandate that “No online platform, website, or digital entity may allow users to bypass age verification requirements through VPNs, proxy services, or other anonymizing technologies.” That bill is awaiting its first committee hearing.

Meanwhile, the state of Indiana is suing Aylo, alleging that the company and its affiliates have violated the state’s AV law by failing to prevent access by users using virtual private networks to avoid geolocation. Indiana’s law does not mention VPNs, but the suit asserts that Aylo is in violation “because Indiana residents, including minors, can still easily access the Defendants’ websites with a VPN IP or proxy address from another jurisdiction or through the use of location spoofing software.”

The new VPN language in SB 73 could impact enforcement of Utah’s age verification law, which went into effect in January 2023.

The bill will next be heard in Utah’s House Revenue and Taxation Committee. If ultimately enacted, it would take effect Oct. 1.

Fast-Tracked Arizona Bill Includes Consent ‘Catch-22’ for Adult Sites

PHOENIX — A bill advancing rapidly through the Arizona state legislature would impose new requirements for adult content uploaded online, including seemingly contradictory provisions that could effectively make it impossible for adult sites to operate in the state.

Riding the current legislative trend aimed at addressing AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, Arizona’s HB 2133, titled the “Protect Act,” seeks to ensure that nude or sexual depictions of individuals, including those generated by AI, cannot be posted without each depicted person’s consent. However, the bill also includes new verification and consent requirements for adult websites.

Under those requirements, adult sites would be required to use “reasonable consent verification methods” to ensure that any individual depicted in sexual material has provided consent. Importantly, it would also require sites to maintain records of such verification for at least seven years, for potential inspection by the state attorney general.

The potential “catch-22” for adult businesses is that the bill defines “reasonable consent verification methods” as including “(i) An affidavit that attests to the consent and age of each depicted person. (ii) A verification through an independent third party. (iii) Any other commercially reasonable method that does not retain identifying information after the verification is complete.”

Since affidavits generally require notarization, the first option would likely prove prohibitively burdensome for all parties involved. Meanwhile, the second and third options seem directly to contradict the requirement to maintain verification records.

Free Speech Coalition Director of Public Policy Mike Stabile told XBIZ, “We are most concerned about the clear conflicts with federal law. It appears that Arizona is asking us to delete age-and-consent records after verification, which is impossible for us to do. We’ve reached out to the legislator to alert him to this issue, and others, as well as to clarify some of the provisions in the bill.”

FSC previously sounded the alarm about the bill, likening it to other “consent minefields” such as North Carolina’s “Prevent Sexual Exploitation of Women and Minors Act,” which effectively invalidates model contracts, and Alabama’s HB 164, which — like the Arizona bill — mandates that model releases must be notarized.

Should the bill become law, sites that fail to obtain “verified” consent would be subject to a civil penalty of $10,000 per day, plus damages and attorney fees.

The bill has now passed the Arizona House of Representatives, and has been transmitted to the state Senate.

GirlsDoPorn Defendants Ordered to Pay Victims $75.5 Million

SAN DIEGO — A federal court has ordered former GirlsDoPorn owner Michael Pratt and his co-defendants in the GDP sex trafficking case to pay restitution totaling $75,568,283.47 to 106 victims.

U.S. District Judge Janis Sammartino of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California ordered Pratt and his former associates to pay GDP victims individual awards ranging from $440 to $6,646,043.

The former associates named in the order are GDP second-in-command Matthew Wolfe, videographer Theodore Gyi, recruiter and performer Ruben Andre “Dre” Garcia and bookkeeper Valorie Moser.

The restitution amount is likely to prove more symbolic than actual, as Pratt is currently serving a sentence of 27 years in federal prison. The order notes that under the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, Pratt is required to pay 50% of his income or $25 per quarter, whichever is greater. Upon release from custody, he would then be required to pay at least $200 per month.

Prospective GDP models were falsely promised that the films they made would never appear online, denied the ability to read contracts, actively misled about provisions, provided with intoxicants during negotiations and before shoots, mistreated, harassed, coerced and assaulted.

For XBIZ’s coverage of the GirlsDoPorn case, click here.